Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 89
Filter
1.
Am J Transplant ; 23(2 Suppl 1): S300-S378, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2313790

ABSTRACT

The past 5 years have posed challenges to the field of heart transplantation. The 2018 heart allocation policy revision was accompanied by anticipated practice adjustments and increased use of short-term circulatory support, changes that may ultimately serve to advance the field. The COVID-19 pandemic also had an impact on heart transplantation. While the number of heart transplants in the United States continued to increase, the number of new candidates decreased slightly during the pandemic. There were slightly more deaths following removal from the waiting list for reasons other than transplant during 2020, and a decline in transplants among candidates listed as status 1, 2, or 3 compared with the other statuses. Heart transplant rates decreased among pediatric candidates, most notably among those younger than 1 year. Despite this, pretransplant mortality has declined for both pediatric and adult candidates, particularly candidates younger than 1 year. Transplant rates have increased in adults. The prevalence of ventricular assist device use has increased among pediatric heart transplant recipients, while the prevalence of short-term mechanical circulatory support, particularly intra-aortic balloon pump and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, has increased among adult recipients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Heart Transplantation , Heart-Assist Devices , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Adult , Humans , Child , United States/epidemiology , Tissue Donors , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Waiting Lists
2.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 18(1): 134, 2023 Apr 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2305068

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 infection can lead to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), right ventricular (RV) failure and pulmonary hypertension. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) has been used for patients with refractory hypoxemia. More recently dual-lumen right atrium to pulmonary artery oxygenated right ventricular assist devices (Oxy-RVAD) have been utilized in the severe medical refractory COVID ARDS setting. Historically, animal data has demonstrated that high continuous non-pulsatile RVAD flows, leading to unregulated and unprotected circulation through the pulmonary vessels is associated with an increased risk of pulmonary hemorrhage and increased amount of extravascular lung water. These risks are heightened in the setting of ARDS with fragile capillaries, left ventricular (LV) diastolic failure, COVID cardiomyopathy, and anticoagulation. Concurrently, due to infection, tachycardia, and refractory hypoxemia, high V-V ECMO flows to match high cardiac output are often necessary to maintain systemic oxygenation. Increase in cardiac output without a concurrent increase in VV ECMO flow will result in a higher fraction of deoxygenated blood returning to the right heart and therefore resulting in hypoxemia. Several groups have suggested using a RVAD only strategy in COVID ARDS; however, this exposes the patients to the risk of pulmonary hemorrhage. We present one of the first known cases using an RV mechanical support, partial flow pulmonary circulation, oxygenated Veno-venopulmonary (V-VP) strategy resulting in RV recovery, total renal recovery, awake rehabilitation, and recovery.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Heart Failure , Heart-Assist Devices , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Animals , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Treatment Outcome , Heart Ventricles , Heart Failure/etiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology , Hypoxia/etiology
4.
Clin Transplant ; 37(4): e14887, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2241672

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Since March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has tremendously impacted health care all around the globe. We analyzed the impact of the pandemic on donors, recipients, and outcome of heart transplantation (HTx). METHODS: Between 2010 and early 2022, a total of n = 235 patients underwent HTx in our department. Patients were assigned to the study groups regarding the date of the performed HTx. Group 1 (09/2010 to 02/2020): n = 160, Group 2 (03/2020 to 02/2022): n = 75. RESULTS: Since the pandemic, the etiology of heart failure in the recipients has shifted from dilated (Group 1: 53.8%, Group 2: 32.0%) to ischemic cardiomyopathy (Group 1: 39.4%, Group 2: 50.7%, p < .01). The percentage of high urgency status of the recipients dropped from 50.0% to 36.0% (p = .05), and the use of left ventricular assist (LVAD) support from 56.9% to just 37.3% (p < .01). Meanwhile, the waiting time for the recipients also decreased by about 40% (p = .05). Since the pandemic, donors were 2- times more likely to have been previously resuscitated (Group 1: 21.3%, Group 2: 45.3% (p < .01), and drug abuse increased by more than 3-times (p < .01), indicating acceptance of more marginal donors. Surprisingly, the incidence of postoperative severe primary graft dysfunction requiring extracorporeal life support decreased from 33.1% to 19.4% (p = .04) since the pandemic. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic affected both donors and recipients of HTX but not the postoperative outcome. Donors nowadays are more likely to suffer from ischemic heart disease and are less likely to be on the high-urgency waitlist and on LVAD support. Simultaneously, an increasing number of marginal donors are accepted, leading to shorter waiting times.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Heart Failure , Heart Transplantation , Heart-Assist Devices , Myocardial Ischemia , Humans , Pandemics , Treatment Outcome , COVID-19/epidemiology , Heart Failure/surgery , Tissue Donors , Retrospective Studies
6.
ASAIO J ; 69(1): 43-49, 2023 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2190972

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to pose a significant threat to patients receiving advanced heart failure therapies. The current study was undertaken to better understand the relationship between obesity and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or heart transplant. We performed a retrospective review of patients with a heart transplant or LVAD who presented to one of the participating 11 institutions between April 1 and November 30, 2020. Patients were grouped by body mass index (BMI) into obese (BMI ≥ 30 k/m2) and nonobese cohorts (BMI < 30 kg/m2). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate effects of obesity on outcomes of interest. Across all centers, 162 heart transplant and 81 LVAD patients were identified; 54 (33%) and 38 (47%) were obese, respectively. Obese patients tended to have more symptoms at presentation. No differences in rates of hospitalization or ICU admission were noted. Obese patients with LVADs were more likely to require mechanical ventilation (39% vs. 8%, p < 0.05). No differences in renal failure or secondary infection were noted. Mortality was similar among heart transplant patients (11% [obese] vs. 16% [nonobese], p = 0.628) and LVAD patients (12% vs. 15%, p = 1.0). BMI was not associated with increased adjusted odds of mortality, ICU admission, or mechanical ventilation (all p > 0.10). In summary, acute presentations of SARS-CoV-2 among heart transplant and LVAD recipients carry a significantly higher mortality than the general population, although BMI does not appear to impact this. Further studies on the longer-term effects of COVID-19 on this population are warranted.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Heart Failure , Heart Transplantation , Heart-Assist Devices , Humans , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Body Mass Index , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Heart Transplantation/adverse effects , Heart Failure/complications , Heart Failure/surgery , Obesity/complications , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
7.
Eur Heart J ; 43(23): 2237-2246, 2022 06 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2188653

ABSTRACT

Heart transplantation is advocated in selected patients with advanced heart failure in the absence of contraindications. Principal challenges in heart transplantation centre around an insufficient and underutilized donor organ pool, the need to individualize titration of immunosuppressive therapy, and to minimize late complications such as cardiac allograft vasculopathy, malignancy, and renal dysfunction. Advances have served to increase the organ donor pool by advocating the use of donors with underlying hepatitis C virus infection and by expanding the donor source to use hearts donated after circulatory death. New techniques to preserve the donor heart over prolonged ischaemic times, and enabling longer transport times in a safe manner, have been introduced. Mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplantation has allowed patients with advanced heart failure to avoid progressive deterioration in hepato-renal function while awaiting an optimal donor organ match. The management of the heart transplantation recipient remains a challenge despite advances in immunosuppression, which provide early gains in rejection avoidance but are associated with infections and late-outcome challenges. In this article, we review contemporary advances and challenges in this field to focus on donor recovery strategies, left ventricular assist devices, and immunosuppressive monitoring therapies with the potential to enhance outcomes. We also describe opportunities for future discovery to include a renewed focus on long-term survival, which continues to be an area that is under-studied and poorly characterized, non-human sources of organs for transplantation including xenotransplantation as well as chimeric transplantation, and technology competitive to human heart transplantation, such as tissue engineering.


Subject(s)
Heart Diseases , Heart Failure , Heart Transplantation , Heart-Assist Devices , Heart Failure/therapy , Heart Transplantation/methods , Humans , Tissue Donors
9.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 22(1): 385, 2022 Dec 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2162294

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary viral myocarditis associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov2) infection is a rare diagnosis. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of an unvaccinated, healthy patient with cardiogenic shock in the context of a COVID-19-associated myocarditis and therapy with simultaneous veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and percutaneous left ventricular decompression therapy with an Impella. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of therapeutic options for patients with COVID-19-associated myocarditis. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients required a combination of two assist devices to achieve sufficient cardiac output until recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction. Due to the rapid onset of this fulminant cardiogenic shock immediate invasive bridging therapy in a specialized center was lifesaving.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Heart-Assist Devices , Myocarditis , Humans , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Stroke Volume , RNA, Viral , Ventricular Function, Left , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Myocarditis/complications , Myocarditis/therapy , Myocarditis/diagnosis
10.
Int J Artif Organs ; 46(1): 15-21, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2162167

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A consensus has not yet been reached regarding which COVID-19 vaccine program should be applied in patients with ventricular assist device (VAD). Our aim was to assess the clinical outcome of inactivated, mRNA and heterologous vaccine program in patient with VAD. METHODS: In this retrospective and cross-sectional study; adult patients who underwent VAD implantation between January 2012 and September 2021 and received any vaccine that were used in Republic of Türkiye for COVID-19, were included. The patients were divided into three groups according to the type of vaccine; "inactivated," "mRNA" and "heterologous." Clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were in each group in the "inactivated," "mRNA" and "heterologous" groups. Mean age was 51.6 ± 12 years in "inactivated" group, 42.5 ± 15.5 years in "mRNA" group and 41.1 ± 15.4 years in "heterologous" group. There was no significant difference between the groups in age, gender, body surface area, body mass index and etiology (p > 0.05). After last dose of vaccines, the number of patients had COVID-19 positive test were three (16.7%), one (5.6%), and two (11.1%) in "inactivated," "mRNA" and "heterologous" groups, respectively. Pump thrombosis was seen in two patients in "mRNA" group and one patient in "heterologous" group. No pump thrombosis was seen in "inactivated" group. COVID-19-related death or intubation was not observed. CONCLUSION: All vaccine that used for COVID-19 are safe and effective in patients with VAD. In countries that give priority to inactivated vaccines, mRNA vaccines may then be made as boosters.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Heart-Assist Devices , Adult , Humans , Middle Aged , COVID-19 Vaccines , BNT162 Vaccine , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies
11.
Cardiol Clin ; 40(3): 329-335, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2130238

ABSTRACT

Despite aggressive care, patients with cardiopulmonary failure and COVID-19 experience unacceptably high mortality rates. The use of mechanical circulatory support devices in this population offers potential benefits but confers significant morbidity and novel challenges for the clinician. Thoughtful application of this complex technology is of the utmost importance and should be done in a multidisciplinary fashion by teams familiar with mechanical support devices and aware of the particular challenges provided by this complex patient population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Heart-Assist Devices , Humans , Shock, Cardiogenic
12.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 34(11): E825, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2093175

ABSTRACT

Left ventricular (LV) unloading has been associated with improved survival in patients treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. This case describes a patient with a COVID-19 infection who subsequently developed non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with an LV ejection fraction of 10% to 15% (baseline echocardiography). He did poorly in the outpatient setting and was admitted to an outside hospital with heart failure symptoms and was subsequently transferred to our hospital for escalation of care and consideration of advanced heart failure therapies. This clinical image and related video series help to visually demonstrate the effect of LV unloading in a 30-year-old male with a history of COVID-19 myocarditis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Heart Failure , Heart-Assist Devices , Male , Humans , Adult , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Heart Ventricles , Ventricular Function, Left , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy
15.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 100(4): 568-574, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2013401

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate characteristics and outcomes of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (AMICS) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has created challenges in delivering acute cardiovascular care. Quality measures and outcomes of patients presenting with AMICS during COVID-19 in the United States have not been well described. METHODS: We identified 406 patients from the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative (NCSI) with AMICS and divided them into those presenting before (N = 346, 5/9/2016-2/29/2020) and those presenting during the COVID-19 pandemic (N = 60, 3/1/2020-11/10/2020). We compared baseline clinical data, admission characteristics, and outcomes. RESULTS: The median age of the cohort was 64 years, and 23.7% of the group was female. There were no significant differences in age, sex, and medical comorbidities between the two groups. Patients presenting during the pandemic were less likely to be Black compared to those presenting prior. Median door to balloon (90 vs. 88 min, p = 0.38), door to support (88 vs. 78 min, p = 0.13), and the onset of shock to support (74 vs. 62 min, p = 0.15) times were not significantly different between the two groups. Patients presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction more often during the COVID-19 period (95.0% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.005). In adjusted logistic regression models, COVID-19 period did not significantly associate with survival to discharge (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-2.19, p = 0.81) or with 1-month survival (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.42-1.61, p = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: Care of patients presenting with AMICS has remained robust among hospitals participating in the NCSI during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Heart-Assist Devices , Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , COVID-19/complications , Female , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Humans , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Pandemics , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/etiology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnosis , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
16.
Perm J ; 26(2): 64-68, 2022 06 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1988462

ABSTRACT

Given the stalling improvement in vaccine hesitancy rates in the United States (US), it is important to understand why a chronically ill group, patients with left-ventricular assist devices (LVADs), might not get vaccinated and to delineate the barriers they may face in seeking care. We conducted an online survey to characterize the attitudes of patients with LVADs toward COVID-19 vaccination, identify their willingness to seek care during the pandemic, and characterize barriers to doing so. Our survey showed that the rate of vaccine hesitancy among LVAD patients is similar to that of the general population in the US. This rate is higher than expected for a chronically ill group at risk of severe COVID-19 infection. We also found that LVAD patients perceive barriers to seeking care during the pandemic. We recommend that LVAD care teams emphasize that patients should seek care for emergency medical conditions despite their fears of contracting COVID-19. Based on our results, we also recommend vaccine uptake education for this population focused on patients' concerns about serious side effects and not enough research done on the vaccine.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Heart-Assist Devices , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , United States , Vaccination
17.
18.
Intern Med ; 61(15): 2319-2325, 2022 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1974464

ABSTRACT

A 60-year-old Japanese woman was hospitalized for cardiogenic shock 24 days after receiving the second dose of the coronavirus disease 2019 BNT162b2 vaccine. Impella CP left ventricular assist device implantation and venoarterial peripheral extracorporeal membranous oxygenation were immediately initiated along with inotropic support and steroid pulse therapy, as an endomyocardial biopsy specimen showed myocarditis. Three weeks later, her cardiac function had recovered, and she was discharged. An immune response associated with the presence of spike protein in cardiac myocytes may be related to myocarditis in the present case because of positive immunostaining for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike protein and C4d in the myocardium.


Subject(s)
BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 , Coronavirus , Heart-Assist Devices , Myocarditis , BNT162 Vaccine/adverse effects , COVID-19/complications , Female , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Humans , Middle Aged , Myocarditis/complications , RNA/therapeutic use , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
19.
J Card Surg ; 37(11): 3947-3950, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1968159

ABSTRACT

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is rare, however, severe hyperinflammatory condition in children generally weeks after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. A subset of MIS-C patients is presented with severe heart failure. We hereby report 8-year-old girl presenting acute severe left ventricular failure. Various medical treatments including inotropic agents and drugs related to SARS-CoV-2 infection and MIS-C were applied. However, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was needed to be performed. Due to unsuccessful attempts for ECMO weaning, left ventricular assist device was implanted to the patient with temporary right ventricular support from ECMO.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Heart Failure , Heart-Assist Devices , COVID-19/complications , Child , Female , Heart Failure/etiology , Heart Failure/therapy , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/etiology , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/therapy
20.
J Card Surg ; 37(10): 3403-3407, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1961650

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, several minimally invasive mechanical support devices have been introduced into clinical practice to support the right ventricle (RV). Percutaneous cannulas are easy to insert, minimally invasive, and treat acute RV failure rapidly. In December 2021, the Food and Drug Administration approved a new 31 French dual lumen single cannula for use as a right ventricular assist device. AIMS: Descirbe the use of the new dual lumen percutaneous right ventricular assist device (RVAD) cannula. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Deployment of the RVAD can be done surgically or percutaneously. This cannula, manufactured by Spectrum, is dual staged. It has inflow ports positioned both in the right atrium (RA) as well as the RV for maximal drainage of the right heart. The distal end of the cannula which includes the outflow port is positioned in the pulmonary artery (PA). RESULTS: Deployment of the Spectrum RVAD can be done percutaneously with transesophageal and flouroscopy guidence. Cannulation requires requisite wire skills in order to navigate into the main pulmonary artery. Utilization of this cannula can be done in acute RV failure secondary to ischemia, post cardiotomy shock, acute respiratory failure or other causes of isolated RV failure. DISCUSSION: The dual stage drainage design optimizes venous drainage as well as limits suck-down events. Theoretically, direct RV decompression also decreases RV dilation and wall tension, and facilitates improved transmural pressure gradient to reduce RV strain. CONCLUSION: Here we describe the first-in-man successful use of the dual-stage RA and RV to PA Spectrum cannula in a patient with severe COVID acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute right ventricular failure, bridged to recovery.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Heart Failure , Heart-Assist Devices , Ventricular Dysfunction, Right , Heart Atria/surgery , Heart Failure/surgery , Heart Ventricles/surgery , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Humans , Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Pulmonary Artery/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL